A single 90-minute session for people who have had a near-death, out-of-body or shared-death experience and want to understand what happened, and why it looked the way it did.
Brendan places your experience on the Consciousness Transition Model, his cross-tradition map of the states consciousness passes through when it disengages from the body, then sends you a written summary of where it sits.

Most published near-death accounts follow a familiar script: the tunnel, the light, the relatives, the life review. Many experiences don't. When yours didn't, the mismatch is often what leaves people stuck, more than the experience itself.
No light, no figures, no direction: darkness or nothingness, sometimes terrifying, sometimes strangely peaceful. Many people only learn later that the void is a recognised kind of near-death experience.
Why was there nothing?Judgement, threat or hell-like imagery, often in people who can't see what they did to deserve it. The CTM reads that imagery very differently from a verdict.
Why me?Merging with light or with consciousness itself and losing the sense of a separate self, with no tunnel or beings at all. Brendan's research calls these "NDEs of the One".
Was mine even an NDE?Seeing your body from outside, during an emergency, in sleep or out of nowhere, and not knowing whether it was real, a dream or something in between.
Was it real?Seeing light, a presence or a departure at someone else's death, sometimes alongside other people in the room.
Did I share it?The same dissolution into oneness, arriving through meditation, grief, a panic attack, a psychedelic or nothing identifiable at all. People in this position often end up reading NDE accounts, because nothing else describes the scale of it. The session is for you too.
Why does this sound like an NDE?Peer groups run by IANDS and ACISTE give experiencers somewhere to be heard, and by policy they don't interpret anyone's experience. Therapists who work in this area offer ongoing support, usually without a model of what the experience was. Both matter. Neither gives you one clear account of what happened and why yours looked different.
Religious frameworks tell you what it meant before you've described it. Materialist frameworks tell you it meant nothing. New Age frameworks tell you it means whatever you like. None of them show you the structure underneath.
of near-death experiencers sought help processing the experience. Fear of disbelief and of being seen as mentally ill were the most common barriers.
Pehlivanova, McNally, Funk & Greyson, Psychology of Consciousness (2025), 167 experiencers
of experiencers said they got help making sense of their NDE.
ACISTE, “What Kind of Support Do Near Death Experiencers Need?” (2020)
The Consciousness Transition Model is built from twenty-three years of research across near-death studies, regression data and the world's contemplative traditions. It treats what you saw as information about where you were on the map, not as a literal photograph of a place.
It is offered as one explanation, which you are free to take or leave. The session gives you a coherent way to think about what happened, not a belief to adopt.
Tunnels, beings of light, judges and heavenly or hellish settings read as the way consciousness renders deeper processes, shaped by culture and expectation. This is why the imagery varies so much from person to person.
Read as memory reintegration rather than moral judgement, which changes what a distressing NDE that felt like condemnation is telling you.
Environments generated by memory, symbol and expectation rather than fixed places, which covers the heaven-like and hell-like settings alike.
Awareness carrying on apart from the body's senses: the mechanism behind out-of-body experiences.
These are questions people post, often anonymously, in near-death forums and support groups, close to their own words. The short answers come from Brendan's research. In a session he works through yours.
You are not, and you are far from alone. In a 2025 University of Virginia study of 167 experiencers (Pehlivanova, McNally, Funk and Greyson), 64% had looked for help making sense of their near-death experience. The most common reasons people held back were fear of not being believed and fear of being thought mentally ill, at 28% each. Keeping quiet is the normal response, not a sign that something is wrong with you.
It doesn't mean something went wrong. The void is a recognised kind of near-death experience: Bruce Greyson and Nancy Evans Bush list it as one of the three main types of distressing NDE, and many peaceful accounts include it too. In the CTM, the familiar script of tunnel, light and relatives is interface imagery, the mind rendering a deeper transition in symbols it already knows. A void is what that transition can look like with little or no imagery laid over it.
Experiencers argue about this a lot. Some call the void a waiting room, some an empty nothing, others closeness to the source of everything. The CTM places its deepest form at the base of its map of reality: the ground before any form appears, pure potential. That is why the same void can feel like annihilation to the personality and like coming home to the person underneath it. Whether yours was that, or an earlier in-between state, is something a session works out from what you describe.
A hellish experience is not a verdict on you. Research reviewed by Nancy Evans Bush and Bruce Greyson has not found that the people who have them are worse people, or more or less religious, than anyone else. In the CTM, flames, judges and threatening figures are imagery drawn from culture and expectation, and these settings are thought-responsive: they amplify the fear that is already there. In recorded cases, including Janine Charrat's, the frightening scene changed when the person changed their intention.
Nothing in the research suggests a distressing NDE is a preview of a fixed fate. The CTM treats these environments as states, not places: they are shaped by fear, expectation and unresolved material from the life, which is why they can change, and in many accounts they changed during the experience itself. Understanding what you saw is often what loosens its hold.
It often feels that way. The CTM reads the life review as memory reintegration: the life replayed, often from other people's point of view, so it can be brought together into one coherent whole. The harshness people feel usually comes from their own judgement rather than an outside one, which is also what many experiencers conclude for themselves afterwards.
Most people hold both possibilities at once, and you don't have to pick one before you understand it. The CTM describes an OBE as perceptual decoupling: awareness carrying on apart from the body's ordinary senses. Some OBEs include details that were later checked and found accurate, which researchers call veridical perception. Others mix that clear perception with dream-like imagery. The session looks at which features of yours point which way.
The fear of not getting back is one of the most common worries after an OBE. In the accounts, it is usually the fear itself that makes return feel blocked, and people describe returning once they calm down or simply intend to. The silver cord appears in some traditions and some accounts and not in others. In the CTM it is interface imagery, so not seeing one says nothing about whether you were still connected to your body.
You may have. Shared-death experiences are reported by relatives, friends and hospice staff, sometimes by several people in the room at once, which is hard to put down to one grieving person's imagination. Raymond Moody collected many of them in Glimpses of Eternity (2010). In the CTM, consciousness is not sealed inside one skull, so the people closest to someone who is dying can sometimes perceive part of their transition.
That is very likely terminal lucidity: an unexpected return of clarity in someone with severe dementia or brain damage, usually hours or days before death. Michael Nahm and Bruce Greyson found 81 case references across 250 years of medical literature. Families often only recognise it afterwards. It is hard to explain if the brain alone produces the mind, and it is one of the findings the CTM draws on.
Dissolving into oneness can arrive through meditation, grief, a panic attack, a psychedelic or nothing at all, and people describe it in almost the same words as NDE accounts of merging with the light. In the CTM that overlap is expected: the deep layers of consciousness a dying person passes through can also be reached while the body is fine. The session reads your experience on the same map as an NDE.
Most experiences don't fit a list. Bring yours to the session, in your own words.
Book a SessionChoose a time below and pay US$245 through Cal.com. The booking form asks a few questions about your experience and how you're doing now.
Ninety minutes, live and one to one. You describe what happened in your own words. Brendan asks questions, then walks you through where it sits on the model and why it may have looked the way it did, including the parts you haven't told anyone.
Within 48 hours of the session you receive a short written summary mapping your experience onto the CTM, with the terms and sources, so you can keep reading on your own.
Some of the hardest experiences to make sense of happen to the people beside a deathbed: a shared-death experience, or terminal lucidity, when someone with advanced dementia or close to death becomes clear and present again shortly before they die.
Families often only recognise what they saw afterwards, and are left holding two explanations they can't choose between. The session works the same way for witnesses: what you saw, what the research says about it, and where it fits on the model.
Therapists and coaches trained in spiritually transformative experiences
Free online peer groups, including one for distressing NDEs
Free referral directory

A researcher, not a medium or a guru. Brendan built the Consciousness Transition Model to place every reported post-mortem and altered state on one map, across near-death research, regression data and the world's traditions.
About Brendan →US$245 for the 90-minute session and your written summary, paid by card when you book. One session, with no package to sign up to.
Times are shown in your own time zone. Your confirmation email has a link to reschedule if you need to.
Questions before you book? Email team@brendandmurphy.com
You describe your experience in your own words, Brendan asks questions, and then he explains where it sits on the Consciousness Transition Model and why it may have looked the way it did. It runs for 90 minutes on a live video call, and you receive a short written summary within 48 hours.
Yes. The session covers out-of-body experiences, shared-death experiences, and unity or ego-dissolution experiences that happened through meditation, grief, panic, psychedelics or no obvious trigger. It also covers what you witnessed at someone else's deathbed, such as terminal lucidity.
No. It is a single, model-based explanation of your experience, not therapy, counselling, medical care or crisis support. If you need ongoing support, the ACISTE Support Directory and IANDS sharing groups are good places to start, and the session works well alongside them.
He will show you where it fits on the CTM and what the research says about experiences like yours. The model is offered as one explanation, which you are free to take or leave. The aim is a clear way to think about what happened, not a belief to adopt.
Yes. Distressing experiences, including the void and hell-like NDEs, are the most thoroughly covered category in Brendan's research for Reverse Engineering the Afterlife.
No. Brendan explains the parts of the model that apply to your experience during the session.
US$245 for the 90-minute session and the written summary, paid by card through Cal.com when you book. There is no package or ongoing commitment.