“Peer review” censorship exemplifies the neophobia in the world of science which serves to protect the status quo rather than improve knowledge by weeding out dubious epistemologies and results, as it is meant to. This supposed mechanism of “quality control” has resulted not only in the dismissal of much important and credible research, but it has also let fraudulent research –and lots of it! — be published at the same time. Papers that appear to support fashionable ideas or entrenched dogmas are likely to fare well, even if they are badly flawed — or outright rubbish!
While doctors today receive strong indoctrination into the vaccine mythology, both via social osmosis and during their time in medical school, their curriculum features almost no factual information on vaccines, their ingredients, what those ingredients do in the human body, whistleblowers, disasters resulting from vaccination campaigns, vaccine history, general harm and risks, Big Pharma’s influence over the whole system (obviously), and so forth.
Scientists around the world are calling for awareness and tougher health protection from threat of wifi devices and EMF in general, citing hundreds of studies in the literature unequivocally demonstrating evidence of harm.
In this article, the politicians who say “vaccines are safe” meet the learned doctors who say they aren’t. Let us guide you through some sentiments shared by doctors and other researchers, and yes, this is just a teeny tiny fraction of the glorious “quackery” to be found on that dangerous terrorist-breeding interweb! We offer the following so that next time you or a colleague offers an opinion on the subject it might actually be vaguely well informed – by people who know something about the subject and aren’t merely regurgitating politically correct age old pharmaceutical propaganda.
From 1895 to 1933, Annie Besant (1847 – 1933) and Charles Leadbeater (1847 – 1934), two of the best known theosophists and metaphysicians of the 20th century, conducted clairvoyant investigations into all of the then known elements and certain compounds in order to observe the so-called “fundamental building blocks” that composed them, as well as their general structure.
“The message is”, in the pioneering Harold Aspden’s words, “[a]ccept the aether is real and has structure and you can understand how matter is created—but ignore the aether and you live in ignorance!”